Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.
Elena Vance is a seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering casino trends and industry developments across North America.